From rural idyll to urban chaos
Posted: May 1, 2012 Filed under: News | Tags: place change, place identity, place meaning, politics Leave a comment »A brace of recent articles at the Independent‘s site came together for me this morning to configure a constellation of important issues that I think all of us have to grapple with at some time or other: when voting, when deciding which places we frequent and which (places and people) we denigrate, when sharing opinions at the bar or over coffee, or when assimilating the views of others (assuming a general desire to move beyond bigotry, I’d be particularly careful when handling the views of some opinion piece writers in the Daily Mail …for example!).
Identity and nationhood, “race” and ignorance, nostalgia and the challenges of adapting when “your place” changes; prospects for the young, injustice for some and impunity for others, etc, etc…
Why Chavs were the riots scapegoats
Why is the rural idyll I call home voting for Marine Le Pen?
Go ahead, grapple and let me know if you make any sense of this partiuclar constellation.
Places, not destinations
Posted: April 13, 2012 Filed under: Reflections | Tags: destinations, place, place meaning, place use 3 Comments »After several years of reading and thinking about tourism, I’ve decided I dislike the term “destination”.
I don’t mind “you will reach your final destination by early evening”, i.e. point of arrival. But when applied to villages, towns, cities, islands, parks and other protected areas, peninsulas, and whole countries… urgh!
OK, the word is widely-used because it is useful to us, but therein lies my niggling discomfort with “destinations” in academia and business parlance: it reflects the generally industrial use of places by travel, tourism and associated industries.
You’ve probably enjoyed visiting many destinations, but ask yourself this, “would I want to live in a destination?”.
Maybe I’m being quirky or just plain semantic-pedantic, but just as most genuinely happy holidaymakers come back from their travels talking about experiences and not travel products–I think most people are interested in places and not destinations. And while we’re on the topic, they are also interested in the people that help make those places come alive, not the professionals that planned some well-integrated destination infrastructure.
In short, people live in places, tourists go to destinations, and I, like many other visitors to places, would prefer to be treated as a person and not identified as a tourist.
Let’s talk more about places and less about the other.
Midnight Beast and the vulnerable image of destination Ibiza
Posted: September 14, 2011 Filed under: Destinations | Tags: British tourism, destination image, hedonism, Ibiza, Mediterannean holidays, party tourism, taking reponsibility Leave a comment »Is this irresponsible tourism? A group of London lads travel to Ibiza to film a music video parodying a certain brand of British tourism–cue littering, reckless spending, drunkenness, vomiting, and the wanton spreading of venereal disease–and subsequently achieve notoriety by posting their production, Pizza in Ibiza, to YouTube (390,000+ views since early June).
While the Director General of Toursim for the Balearic Islands’ autonomous community, Jaime Martínez, has erupted–“it’s intolerable that four louts have smeared the image of Ibiza for their own benefit”–I was left wondering if they hadn’t captured part of the reality of mass party tourism to Ibiza.
As several academics have intuited, destinations that assume visitors are passive consumers of those products marketed to them, do so at their long-term peril. Are Midnight Beast not rebellious tourists making a good point about the vagaries of the mass-market sun, sand and sea holiday industry, albeit not to everyone’s taste?
OK, I’m probably stretching the argument a bit there. But see for yourself. Reflect. I know what “we Brits” can be like abroad, but… Have you been to Ibiza? Was the Mickey ripe for the taking? Or was Ibiza just unlucky to have been singled out, given that any number of Mediterranean holiday destinations might have qualified for the same treatment?
Understandably, Martínez counters that the image portrayed by the music video is “false and distorted”. And quite rightly he points out that Ibiza has more to offer than the sun, sand, sea and clubbing formula, including holiday experiences linked to the island’s past, its natural environment, gastronomy and so on. But as an advocate for the island’s tourism industry in its current form he’s in a tricky position. Besides conservation efforts and the need to encourage other kinds of tourism, Martínez states clearly that Ibiza’s acclaimed nightlife “must be maintained”. So is the challenge to make hedonistic tourism to Ibiza more responsible? Is this feasible?
In Taking Responsibility for Tourism Harold Goodwin considers that “once a destination gains a hedonistic reputation it is very difficult to move away from it: the established businesses rely on the kind of tourism for which they have a reputation and other opportunities are generally incompatible with party tourism. There is a strong case for enclaving it and isolating it” (p.181). But even if party tourism could be enclaved in Ibiza, those holidays would still take place in and be identified with Ibiza, leaving the island’s reputation vulnerable to the whims of the press, songwriters, videomakers, word-of-mouth, etc, etc… the list of potential Channels of Denigration is long!.
Goodwin also highlights a number of initiatives to build bridges between the originating market–in this case the UK–and the destination. This includes tour operators Club 18-30 and Thomas Cook working with bar owners in destinations, holiday rep training on sustainability in destinations, advertising campaigns, distributing awareness-raising posters to hotels, and providing pre-departure information on drugs, alcohol and sex; the UK’s Department of Health (Be Frank and Drinkaware campaigns), the UK Foreign Office (Know Before You Go) and the Travel Foundation (Make a Difference While You Party).
These are responses from a diversity of organisations in the originating market. They attempt to nudge, encourage and warn young holidaymakers to avoid certain behaviours once in destinations like Ibiza. So what can the destination do?
I would like to see a reflective response from authorities and other major tourism stakeholders in Ibiza. Putting aside questions over merit or intention, Pizza In Ibiza demonstrates how readily a destination can be disparaged, even by ‘amateurs’, in a marketplace much defined now by social networking activity, stiff competition, and consumer whims.
Ibiza, much like other destinations, can only partially affect the image it portrays to potential holidaymakers. In contrast, by prioritising the ongoing development of better places to live in and visit, tourism authorities might have less media crisis management to do in the long-run.
Perhaps a bit like a recovering alcoholic, those with power, control and responsibility in the destination need first to agree that they have issues to deal with; collectively, as a whole. Ultimately, solutions will depend on many, often quite disparate groups recognising their role and responsibility in sustaining a shared place (the destination), a shared trade (tourism) and a shared image of both.
In the meantime, other intriguing illustrations of the vulnerability of destinations in relation to the behaviour of tourists, national stereotypes, fragmented business interests, and the difficulties of steering the destination towards a more desirable future, will surely abound. I will write again soon on similar incidents that have emerged in Barcelona from that other group often overlooked or assumed to be passive in the creation of visited places. “Locals” can be as rebellious as tourists, if not more so, corrupting efforts to maintain pleasing destination images in the process.
[This post also appears at RT Notes from the Field]
Better people and places amid the post-riot cacophony
Posted: August 16, 2011 Filed under: News | Tags: belonging, place identity, politics of place, sense of place Leave a comment »I have taken my first plunge into blogging here close on the heels of rioting in urban England. Many of the first televised reactions with those affected first and first-hand—the non-rioting residents of some London neighbourhoods—revealed the shocks to many people’s sense of place, particularly in terms of their identifying with the place they live in. One black woman’s plaintive response sticks in my mind: “…but this is England”, as if this kind of thing doesn’t and shouldn’t happen in her place, her home, her England. Issues of belonging lie beneath the surface of what has happened too—“this is our community, and we have come here to get it back on its feet again”.
But since those first reports, a post-riot cacophony has ensued, dominated by the ding-dong of largely hypocritical party political rhetoric. David Harvey aptly observes: “political power so hastily dons the robes of superior morality and unctuous reason so that no one might see it as so nakedly corrupt and stupidly irrational”. While David Hayes suggests “the heavy linguistic armoury deployed by the opposed political thought-blocs leaves no space for the complex particularity that an intimate, honest facing of the base reality of these events would surely bring.”
Hayes goes on to argue for:
“a detailed, granular, searching investigation of all aspects of the week of 4-11 August, from the moment of Mark Duggan’s shooting: an empirical sociology of urban England at a particular moment (one that takes account, too, of conditions where trouble might have happened but didn’t)…
Before it is too late, everyone – rioters, looters, victims, police, spectators, immigrants, natives, politicians, experts, people who intervened to heal divisions or save lives – needs the opportunity to speak and be heard. That is a project around which all involved can in principle cohere.”
I agree. The situation requires a detailed, non-partisan analysis that surveys the full-range of individuals involved, from those who made these places erupt, to those implicated in making these places better places to live in than they perhaps were before the beginning of “black August”.